The International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences (IJOBSMS) follows a strict double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality, originality, and research integrity. The journal is committed to maintaining a fair, objective, and confidential review system for all submitted manuscripts.
IJOBSMS follows a double-blind peer review model in which:
This ensures impartial evaluation and reduces potential bias during the review process.
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess:
Manuscripts that do not meet the journal requirements may be returned to authors or rejected before peer review.
Manuscripts that pass initial screening are assigned to qualified reviewers with relevant subject expertise. Reviewers are selected based on:
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:
The final decision on publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on reviewer recommendations and editorial evaluation. Possible decisions include:
Authors are required to address reviewer comments carefully and submit a revised manuscript along with a response to reviewers. If necessary, revised manuscripts may be sent for re-evaluation.
All manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. Editors and reviewers must not disclose, share, or use unpublished information for personal or professional purposes.
Reviewers and editors must declare any conflicts of interest. Individuals with conflicts that may affect impartiality must withdraw from the review process.
Any attempt to manipulate the peer review process is considered serious misconduct. This includes:
Confirmed misconduct may result in rejection and notification to relevant authorities.
IJOBSMS follows COPE Core Practices and internationally accepted publication ethics standards. The journal promotes integrity, transparency, and accountability in all editorial processes.
The peer review timeline varies depending on manuscript quality, reviewer availability, and revision requirements. The journal follows an efficient and flexible review process to ensure timely decisions.
Reviewer comments are advisory in nature and assist editorial decision-making. The final responsibility for published content rests with the authors.