Published: October 24, 2020

Behavioral Influences on Educational Satisfaction among Students

Dr. Fiona Kavanagh
Author

Abstract

Whereas one might conventionally measure educational satisfaction in the tertiary sector by way of institutional infrastructure, the caliber of faculty or curriculum design, modern educational psychology has come to view it as a function of something more internal: self-regulation, interpersonal engagement and behavioral patterns that mediate student contentment. In this study we put to the test the proposition that behaviors such as intrinsic motivation, the way a student manages stress or seeks help from peers are in effect the psychological lens for interpreting an institution’s offerings. Our approach is a mixed-methods one; we have combined large-scale econometric tracking with the kind of qualitative pedagogical narratives that provide context. A cross-sectional survey of 850 undergraduates from a range of disciplines yielded our quantitative data on multidimensional satisfaction and behavioral frequency. We then triangulated these figures with qualitative material from 60 semi-structured interviews conducted with university counselors, academic advisors and leaders of the student union.

The quantitative side was put through its paces with advanced statistical modeling, including hierarchical multiple regression and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess predictive validity. The qualitative transcripts were thematically analysed for their content, which turned up some stark psychological impediments to satisfaction in the form of social isolation and the debilitating effects of burnout. What the evidence shows is a strong correlation: students who are intrinsically motivated and work proactively with their peers put in 76 per cent higher overall scores for educational satisfaction than those who are disengaged. Regression analysis underlined the importance of active self-regulated learning and intrinsic motivation as positive predictors (β = 0.68, p < 0.001), while chronic procrastination and unaddressed burnout had the opposite effect (β = -0.52, p < 0.01). It is the finding of this research that if universities are to improve retention and student satisfaction they need to do more than deliver services passively; they must cultivate a supportive behavioral ecosystem through things like peer mentorship and mental health provision.

Keywords
Educational Satisfaction Student Behavior Intrinsic Motivation Self-Regulation Higher Education Burnout Peer Collaboration Educational Psychology                                  
Full Text Available

Download the complete research article in PDF format.

Download PDF
Share Research