SOMATOTYPE OF INDIAN FEMALE HAMMER THROWERS OF DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE LEVELS

Authors

  • Dr. Sukhraj Singh Assistant Professor, Punjabi University TPD Malwa College, Rampura Phul- Mehraj, Punjab, India
  • Dr. N.S. Deol Head, Department of Physical Education, Punjabi University Patiala, India
  • S. S. Kang Junior Scientific Officer Department of Sports Anthropometry, SAI-NSNIS, Patiala, India

Keywords:

Endomorphy, Mesomorphy, Ectomorphy and Hammer throwers.

Abstract

The present study have been conducted on female hammer throwers (n=30) of India, categorized under five different performance level Groups. Ten anthropometric measurements like height, body weight, two bony diameters, girths and skinfolds were taken with standard instruments and standard techniques of Ross et al, 1980. Somatotypes were computed by using equations of Carter, 1980.
Results reveals that mean age (years) of present study Hammer throwers was ranging from 18 to 22 years and shown significant F-ratio (3.21*) at 5% level. Tallest and Heaviest female hammer throwers were reported in Group III (Height: 165± 1.87) & Body weight: 74± 6.11) and shortest Height in Group V (163.7± 4.52) and Weight in Group-I (58.37± 12.6) respectively. On applying Anova, the f ratio value was found non significant difference in height, height weight ratio among all five groups. Height weight ratio was ranging from 42.83 to 39.73 and has non significant F-ratio among all five groups. In somatotype, Endomorphy was recorded maximum Group-II (5.77) and minimum in Group-V (3.69), Mesomorphy was investigated maximum in Group-II (4.37) and minimum in Group-I (2.51), Ectomorphy (leanness of body) was reported maximum in Group-I (2.20) and minimum in Group- II (0.77) all three components, of five hammer throwing groups have shown not significant F-ratio among each other. From this study, it was concluded that top performer groups have shown low endomorphy and more mesomorphy components and tall with respect to low performance groups.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Carter, J.E.L.(1980) The Heath Carter Somatotype Method. SDSU Syllabus Service, San Diego

Carter, J. E. L. (1970). The somatotype of athletes. A review. Human Biology: 42.535.

Heath, B.H. and Carter, J.E.L. (1967) A modified Somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology2, 57-74.

de Garay, A.L. Levine, L. and Carter, J.E.L. (1974) Genetic and anthropological studies of Olympic Athletes, Academic Press, New York. CF.

Parnell, R.W. (1951). Some notes on physique and athletic training wit special reference to heart size. Brit. Med. J.,1:1292

Ross, W.D. Drinkwater, D. T., Bailey, A., Marshal, G. R. and Lehay, R. (1980) Kinanthropometry: Traditions and New perspectives. In Beunen, Simons. Kinanthropometry II. Pp 3-27, University Park Press, Baltimore.

Sidhu, L.S. Singh, J. and Singh, S.P. (1990) Physique and Body Composition of different categories of Runners, PP. 95-102.

Tanner, J.M. (1964) The Physique of the Olympic Athlete, George Allen and Unwin, London. Weiner, J.S. and Lourie, J.A. (1969) Human Biology: A guide to field methods. IBP no. 9, blackbell, London.

Mandeep Singh Nathial, Analysis of set shot in basketball in relation with time to perform the course and displacement of center of gravity, American Journal of Sports Science, Vol.2 Issue.5 pp: 122-126 (2014). Retrieved from https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo.aspx?journalid=155& doi=10.11648/j.ajss.20140205.13

Mandeep Singh (2010). Evaluation And Improvement of Sports Techniques Through Biomechanical Updated Analyzing Technology, University News, Journal of Higher Education Association of Indian Universities, Association of Indian Universities, Vol:48:Issue.05;2010 Pp45-57, 2010

Mandeep Singh Nathial, A Study of Adjustment and Emotional Intelligence of University Coaches in India, American Journal of Applied Psychology. Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2014, pp. 122-126. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20140306.11

Nathial, mandeep singh. A COMPARATIVE AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF SELF-ESTEEM AND JOB SATISFACTION IN ATHLETES AND NON ATHLETES. Journal of Advances in Social Science and Humanities, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.15520/jassh210123

Singh, M., Kour, R., & Kour, A., A collaborative diversified investigation of respective responses of sports person coaches and organizations on criminalization of doping. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6 (S3), 11295–11310. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.8641

Mandeep Singh., Assessment of Vocational Interests of Pahadi & Bakarwal School Students In Relation To Their Gender. Int J Recent Sci Res. 9(3), pp. 24817-24819.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2018.0903.1731

Singh, M., & Deol, N. S.; KINEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF HIGH DRIVE IN SOCCER. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH PEDAGOGY AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION AND MOVEMENT SCIENCES, 1(01). Retrieved from https://ijems.net/index.php/ijem/article/view/5

Published

2012-12-31

How to Cite

Singh, D. S., Deol , D. N., & Kang, S. S. (2012). SOMATOTYPE OF INDIAN FEMALE HAMMER THROWERS OF DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE LEVELS. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 1(4), 95–99. Retrieved from https://ijobsms.org/index.php/ijobsms/article/view/59