Peer Review Policy

Online ISSN: 2277-7547
Peer Review Policy Overview

The International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences (IJOBSMS) follows a strict double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality, originality, and research integrity. The journal is committed to maintaining a fair, objective, and confidential review system for all submitted manuscripts.

Double-Blind Peer Review

IJOBSMS follows a double-blind peer review model in which:

The identities of authors are not disclosed to reviewers.
The identities of reviewers are not disclosed to authors.

This ensures impartial evaluation and reduces potential bias during the review process.

Initial Editorial Screening

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial screening to assess:

Relevance to journal aims and scope
Compliance with author guidelines & formatting
Ethical compliance and publication standards
Plagiarism and similarity check

Non-compliant manuscripts may be returned or rejected before peer review.

Reviewer Selection

Qualified reviewers with relevant expertise are assigned based on:

Subject expertise
Research and publication experience
Academic qualifications
Absence of conflicts of interest
Review Assignment & Evaluation Criteria

Each manuscript passing screening is evaluated by at least two independent expert reviewers under confidentiality.

Criterion 1 Originality & contribution to knowledge
Criterion 2 Methodological soundness
Criterion 3 Scientific and analytical quality
Criterion 4 Relevance to journal scope
Criterion 5 Clarity of presentation
Criterion 6 Ethical compliance
Editorial Decision Outlook

The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on reviewer recommendations:

Accept
Minor Revision
Major Revision
Reject
Revision & Timeline

Authors must address comments thoroughly and submit a response document. Re-evaluation is conducted if needed.

Typical Timeline: Initial screening takes 7–10 days; peer review requires 2–6 weeks depending on availability and manuscript complexity.

Confidentiality, Ethics & Misconduct Policy

Confidentiality & Conflicts: Manuscripts are treated as strictly confidential. Editors and reviewers must not use unpublished data and must declare conflicts of interest, withdrawing when impartiality is compromised.

Peer Review Misconduct: Manipulation attempts (false reviewer info, report fabrication, coercion, or confidentiality breaches) lead to immediate rejection and reporting to relevant authorities.

COPE Ethics: IJOBSMS follows COPE Core Practices to promote integrity, transparency, and accountability across all editorial processes.

Disclaimer: Reviewer comments are advisory in nature and assist editorial decision-making. The final responsibility for published content rests with the authors.